Jbl studio 590 youtube11/6/2023 ![]() ![]() With subs without subsĪnd it wasn't just SPL level as well. Hands down the JBL's whether it was 2 channel surround crossovers set at 80 60 whatever I felt the JBLs presence more then the Klipsch. But as far as separation accuracy and details midrange being to forward or recessed (which neither are)well it's a tie they both sound great it's just what your ears prefer. My ears just prefer the tuning of the JBL's so far. The Klipsch are meaty and thicker and I'd say the mids are a nice warm not to inaccuracy it's just the way they are tuned. The JBL'S is more clean and neutral though it sounds not cool but more like a monitor which is what my ears like. The JBLs have excellent tonal balance as well. ![]() They both have excellent midrange the Klipsch have this wonderful meaty tonal balance that makes everything so wonderful to listen to. I prefer the JBL's but only due to my ear preference. ![]() The Klipsch have wonderful highs and they are very quick and detailed but the JBL have all of that with much better separation and space and air clear knod goes to the JBL. But they play clean at way higher volumes although they can handle more power then the Klipsch so that's no knock against the Klipsch. They are very neutral so we're the Klipsch. They are not bright neither were the Klipsch. They have that sense of space air and separation that I look for. And some AB switching ears have poor memory. But more critical listening needs to be done. They are better then the RP 8000fs in my opinion so far. The reason I couldn't help it is that these are some very very nice enjoyable speakers. Ok I listened at them at low to moderate to high levels before work yesterday I couldn't help it! Lol. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |